In partnership with

World of AI | Edition # 44

Builder.ai: From Billion-Dollar AI Darling to Bust — What Went Wrong?

Founded with bold ambitions, Builder.ai aimed to democratize software creation through its platform, Builder Studio. The promise? That even someone with no technical background could create a fully functional app using natural language prompts. It sounded like the future—but underneath the surface, the operation was more smoke and mirrors than true AI innovation.

The Illusion of Effortless AI Coding

In a striking turn of events, Builder.ai—a UK-based startup once valued at $1.5 billion and backed by tech giants like Microsoft and SoftBank—has crumbled to zero. The company, which promised to revolutionize software development by making app-building accessible to non-coders, is now bankrupt amid allegations of fraud and a deeply flawed business model.

Builder Studio pitched itself as a no-code, AI-powered development tool. Users were told they could simply describe their app idea in plain English, and the platform would generate it automatically using advanced machine learning. The pitch resonated in a market hungry for fast, affordable software solutions.

But the technology didn't deliver on its lofty promises. Instead of AI independently producing clean, functional code, Builder.ai relied heavily on a team of underpaid human developers based in India. These programmers were tasked with fixing and finishing the AI-generated code, turning unusable prototypes into workable demos.

This reliance on human intervention was so extensive that one could argue the platform wasn’t truly AI-powered at all. As Fireship humorously put it, Builder.ai was "an artificial intelligence tool powered by biological intelligence."

This workaround approach may have helped the company fake its way to functional demos in the short term, but it proved to be fundamentally unscalable. The mismatch between the marketing and the reality would eventually come back to haunt them.

The Real Reason for the Collapse: Fraud Allegations

While technical shortcomings were damaging, they weren’t the fatal blow. Builder.ai ultimately collapsed due to alleged financial misconduct.

According to reports, the company engaged in a roundtrip billing scheme with one of its partners. This involved invoicing for work that was never actually completed, thereby artificially inflating the company’s revenue figures to make the business appear more successful than it really was.

This deception was uncovered when one of Builder.ai’s creditors caught wind of the scheme and seized $37 million from the company’s accounts. With such a substantial financial loss and no sustainable business model to fall back on, Builder.ai had no choice but to declare bankruptcy.

The collapse sent shockwaves through the AI startup world, particularly because of the big names involved. Microsoft and SoftBank’s support gave the startup a level of credibility that may have helped it raise funds and gain media attention—despite the fact that its tech was nowhere near as capable as advertised.

A Reflection of the AI Bubble?

Builder.ai’s demise comes amid a larger cultural moment for artificial intelligence—one where excitement and skepticism are in constant tension. On one hand, generative AI systems like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude 4 are capturing headlines with incremental improvements. On the other hand, the industry is seeing a proliferation of overhyped and underdelivered products, much like what we saw during the dot-com boom.

Meanwhile, researchers are beginning to explore the next frontier: autonomous, self-improving AI. A recent paper introduced the Darwin Goodell machine, a self-editing AI system that modifies its own Python code to optimize performance on coding benchmarks. The concept is similar to Google’s AlphaCode, but with potentially broader implications.

If such systems work at scale, they could signal a fundamental shift in how software is developed. But, as Builder.ai demonstrates, the path to that future is littered with failed promises and questionable ethics.

The AI Gold Rush: Boom or Bust?

Builder.ai’s rapid rise and fall is emblematic of the current AI gold rush. Startups today can secure massive funding based on little more than a compelling narrative and the strategic use of buzzwords. As the Fireship video quips, “The most important lesson is that your tech doesn’t actually need to work to get super rich.”

The consequences of this approach, however, are becoming harder to ignore. As with any economic bubble, unsustainable practices eventually lead to collapse. Some observers believe AI is on track to eliminate up to 90% of white-collar jobs in the next five years. Others see it as nothing more than the latest Silicon Valley pyramid scheme.

The truth probably lies somewhere in between. AI will almost certainly transform industries, but the path will include both breakthroughs and blowups. Transparency, accountability, and a solid understanding of how these systems actually function will be essential for navigating the road ahead.

For anyone looking to make sense of the current AI landscape—or even build something meaningful within it—it’s important to move beyond the hype. That starts with education.

Discover the many benefits of global hiring

Global hiring and remote work are rising. Deel’s here to help. With our Business Case for Global Hiring Guide, we’ll guide you through everything.

Learn more about:

• Benefits of global hiring

• Global hiring methods

• Costs of global hiring

• Solutions to global hiring challenges

Isn't it time you dive into a world of global hiring capabilities? Explore the ins and outs of global hiring with our free, ready-to-use guide.

Download now